Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit onefan51's column >>

ONEFAN51

There can be no tomorrow if there is no today
Articles Posted: 13  Links Seeded: 29
Member Since: 8/2010  Last Seen: 2/22/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Poll: Has President Obama been treated fair by his opponents since taking office

Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:09 PM EDT
politics, opinion, poll, critics, supporters, opponents
By onefan51

Live Poll

Has President Obama been treated fair by his opponents since taking office

View Results
  • 152702
    Yes
    25%
  • 152703
    No
    74%
  • 152704
    Unsure
    1%

VoteTotal Votes: 188

Advertise | AdChoices

President Obama’s opponents cite his failure to improve the economy as a symbol of his inexperience as a business leader. 

They note that he is a Socialist dictator who passed a stimulus package and a healthcare program which has ballooned the national debt to the edge of bankruptcy. 

His supporters argue the stimulus was necessary and without it the country would be in far worse economic shape than it is now.  They also make the point that his healthcare program protects those with pre-existing conditions and allows wider coverage for older-aged children on their parents’ insurance plans.

His critics label him weak on national defense and domestic policy. Proponents of the president believe this criticism is unfair because his critics have publicly pledged to ensure the failure of his presidency.

Some opponents have even labeled Obama as the worst president in the history of the United States.  Supporters counter that this is utter nonsense and that such ranting is simply untrue at face value.

In considering the economic conditions which had taken place before he was elected, what do you think?  Has President Obama been treated fairly since taking office?

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • onefan51's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Media Outrage, Seeders and Posters w/ Manners, World News and Views
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (139)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
onefan51

What do you think? Has President Obama been treated fair since taking office?

CoH. Please.

  • 5 votes
#1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:10 PM EDT
blue-iris

Currently 47% of all Americans are dependent on our Government. I think his goal should be to reduce that number.

Every action brings on a reaction. He is reaping what he has sown.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:22 PM EDT
lib50

Too bad so many Americans don't make enough money to live on, yet the rich get richer and the middle class gets decimated. Since Obama did NOT cause this recession, we are ALL reaping what Bush policies and the collapse of the financial sector have done to this country. And Americans know who is to blame, and it is not Obama.

  • 18 votes
#1.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:30 PM EDT
Nick46

Has any President been treated fair? But probably not. People have no concept about what a President can and can't do. All we know is what the opposing party tells us.

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:57 PM EDT
SCTexan

Fair? depends, he's getting the same thing all the others have gotten, especially by the opposition.

  • 3 votes
#1.4 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:25 PM EDT
Neish1920

Has any President been treated fair? But probably not. People have no concept about what a President can and can't do. All we know is what the opposing party tells us.

Exactly, he cant bring back jobs from China, nor tell a company to use human recruiters that sit in an office vs outsourcing the positions over seas. He cant tell Bank of America to hire more tellers vs using ATM machines that are more advanced and can damn near do the work of an entry level teller anyway. He cant tell Walmart and Kmart to hire more cashiers vs using self check out machines. He cant tell the local hosptal to rehire all the admin assistants back vs using software that allows a person to do their own adminsitrative actitives without the help of a live perosn.

  • 9 votes
#1.5 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:37 PM EDT
certs2345

Since Obama did NOT cause this recession, we are ALL reaping what Bush policies and the collapse of the financial sector have done to this country. And Americans know who is to blame, and it is not Obama

Let's examine this. Wasn't obama part of the legislature that helped cause the recession? Why didn't he challenge fwanks and dodd while they protected fannie and freddie? Hasn't he retained many of the bush financial policy setters along with hiring several of those evil bastards wall street goons? And more to the point, after idiot bush started 2 wars that have drained our coffers, hasn't idiot obama not only continued them, but escalated the "war of necessity" in Afghanistan not to mention start one with Libya? Let's not forget ordering military actions in Yemen and Pakistan. I call BS on your assessment.

How about the lame stream medias unfair treatment that works in his favor?

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:26 PM EDT
snarky68

Not anymore than any other president in the last 30 years.

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:40 PM EDT
Walt42

SCTexan...

he's getting the same thing all the others have gotten, especially by the opposition

Can't agree. In all my years of listening to politic rhetoric, I never heard such blatantly disgusting attack statements as I heard from Congressman Boehner and Senator McConnell, when they stood before congress and asserted that they would do everything in their power to make President Obama a one term president. They didn't say anything about working 'across the aisle' to do the country's work (for which they were elected), the informed the electorate that they not only disagreed with the electorate's decision, but they would against that decision. As I said, I find their comments disgusting for elected officials.

  • 10 votes
#1.8 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:53 PM EDT
SCTexan

I guess all the "Bush is stupid" and similar type remarks etc don't count?

  • 4 votes
#1.9 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 8:02 AM EDT
Matt Rock

President Bush almost became the first President to die in office since Kennedy because he didn't chew a peanut. I mean seriouly, he cracks open an afternoon snack, and ten seconds later it's down goes Frazier! He made so many public speaking gaffes that entire calendars (plural!) were made in his honor, with a dumb quote for every day of the year. Remember this tort reform gem? "not enough OBGYN's are allowed to practice their love with women, he-he-he-he-he." Okay, I added that last part, sue me! Oh right, you can't... tort reform :P

Bush was labeled stupid by people on the left AND the right (don't forget his record-low approval ratings, that wasn't all liberals) because he said and did stupid things. President Obama is labeled stupid mostly by people on the right, because he isn't doing everything exactly the way they demand it be done. That's a pretty meteoric difference, is it not?

  • 6 votes
#1.10 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:02 AM EDT
Walt42

And, which politician call Bush 'stupid' ??

  • 6 votes
#1.11 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:04 AM EDT
onefan51

I guess all the "Bush is stupid" and similar type remarks etc don't count?

Was it fair for the opposition to call Bush stupid? Or for those who dislike Obama to say that is a Muslim, Socialist, or Terrorist? I don't know. I know it not good if members of Congress use such terms. But when Bush was elected to his first term, he had help from the SCOTUS. Obama won by a substantial margin. In your opinion, who received more support from Congress during their first 100 days in office, Bush or Obama?

  • 5 votes
#1.12 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:47 AM EDT
Lynn-410457

SC Texan, If Bush 2 was so beloved by the GOP please tell me why the party distanced themselves from during the last election. Hells bells, McCain never appeared on stage with him and they avoided him like Typhoid Mary. Come on, its politics you and I both know it, but don't try now to make W into something he was not!

  • 7 votes
#1.13 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:54 AM EDT
SCTexan

Both Bushs were progressive Republicans. I disliked both. I'm tired of having to hold my nose and vote for the least objectionable candidate, it appears that again will be the choice this coming election. One good thing about living in Texas is that the state will go Republican so I can vote third party and not fear that my vote will allow my least favorite candidate to win.

So who will win; the giant douche or the turd sandwich. (South Park episode)

  • 3 votes
#1.14 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 10:18 AM EDT
onefan51

SCTexan

who received more support from Congress during their first 100 days in office, Bush or Obama?

  • 1 vote
#1.15 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 10:34 AM EDT
SCTexan

Let's see,

Bush: block funding to Family Planning, No Child Left behind started, allowed government money to religious charities performing government work, presented tax plan, International sub incident, international incident with spy plane, meet with Americas leaders.

Obama: Got recovery package passed, implemented foreclosure prevention program, addressed bank bailout efforts, auto bailout, meet with Prime Minister.

  • 3 votes
#1.16 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 11:10 AM EDT
blue-iris

To lib50. "too bad so many Americans....." Well perhaps they should (those that can) get off of Government assistance and create their own utopia perhaps employ others instead of just sucking their livelihood from a government source and wondering why they are not rich.

  • 4 votes
#1.17 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 11:46 AM EDT
onefan51

SCTexan

Please feel free to admonish me if I'm wrong, but didn't Bush receive bipartisan support for his legislative agenda during his first 100 days and Obama received no such support.

  • 5 votes
#1.18 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 12:24 PM EDT
SCTexan

From the list, I don't see much fighting in either case, except maybe the auto bail out.

  • 1 vote
#1.19 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 12:48 PM EDT
Lynn-410457

Congress voted SEVEN times during the Bush Presidency to increase the debt limit. But now they are giving Obama so much grief. The only difference in them is their color, they are and were both POTUS.

  • 8 votes
#1.20 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 12:52 PM EDT
Ronin-2

Maybe it is payback for Obama voting against increasing the debt limit while he was in the Senate? Sure, Obama has apologized and claims he "Made a mistake." Shoe is on the other foot now and he doesn't like it.

  • 2 votes
#1.21 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 1:01 PM EDT
Carol-500283

Texan-it wasn't a bailout-they are PAYING it BACK. Wall ST. now there's a bailout!

  • 3 votes
#1.22 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 1:15 PM EDT
SCTexan

Carol, I have seen that while most is being paid back, some will not be.

Let’s not suggest that Chrysler repaid $7.6 billion in government liabilities with $7.6 billion in revenue yield from net profits, because that’s precisely what most Americans think when they read such a headline.

Your readers presume Chrysler got back on its feet, sold cars like hotcakes, and repaid the loan early with stacks of cash in a suitcase. Chrysler has repaid nothing and has no wherewithal to pay off their liabilities, now or in the future, unless they borrow money elsewhere to do it.

The facts are these: Fiat owns 30 percent of Chrysler and as part of the federal bailout, President Obama promised Fiat another 16 percent share at a significantly reduced price if Fiat repaid at least $3.5 billion of the bailout.

Banks will not loan Fiat $3.5 billion to help re-pay, so the Department of Energy loaned Fiat precisely $3.5 billion to pay it off.

Like a blood transfusion from the left arm to the right, we allowed Chrysler to re-pay the first loan with a second loan. Typical government sleight of hand.

Chrysler has cost the American taxpayer $13 billion, even though the government’s Securities and Exchange Commission values the company at less than $5 billion.

Think GM is doing any better? Think again. Their “Paid in Full” ad campaign only referenced $6.7 billion in cash loans; it does not account for the $40 billion equity stake Joe Taxpayer assumed in the company, which is even worse based on the company’s past performance.

If shell-game victories are what the DDN chooses to endorse, is it too much to ask to provide facts and figures to inform, rather than placate, the reader? Editorializing without facts makes both writer and reader a victim to the cause.

  • 1 vote
#1.23 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 1:41 PM EDT
Lynn-410457

Ronin2, Pay Back at the expense of the American taxpayers? This bunch up there now are some of the most conniving, mean spirited, hateful and yes evil that has ever been. They need to start with ferret face McConnell and weeping John Boehner and clean it out. Nothing will ever be accomplished for good for this country as long as those 2 are there.

  • 5 votes
#1.24 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 1:53 PM EDT
Ronin-2

Lynn,

I am with the GOP on getting cuts in return for raising the debt ceiling.

Congress can only do 1 thing- spend, spend, spend. If they do not start capping their spending they will need to raise the debt ceiling next year, and every year thereafter.

They already talking about removing the Dollar as the world currency. Continously raising our debt limit is almost as bad defaulting on paying interest on our loans.

  • 1 vote
#1.25 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 2:12 PM EDT
Lynn-410457

Ronin2, It is rumored that the deal coming out is 15% of raising taxes and 85% cuts. When the Rethuglicans decided to play the game "political theatre" and walk out the ratio was 17% raising taxes and 83% spending cuts. So we see what the real intention of Eric Cantor and that bunch was. To make some kind of announcement, thus fooling all of you that think they are doing such a good job up there. Now they have to come back into town and get the job done. What a bunch of leeches they are up there, and come election time, every incumbent needs to go whether they are Democrat, Teabagger, Independent, or Rethuglican. This is ridiculous, the game that these do-nothings are paying and it is costing us middle class people an arm and a leg.

  • 4 votes
#1.26 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 2:36 PM EDT
Ronin-2

Could you post a link to the deal being 17% and 83% when they walked out? Or is that a rumor as well?

I have no problem with them walking away from negotiations if the deal was not to their liking, and they were at an impasse. That is a part of the negotiating process. I walked away twice from the car dealership before I bought a car- and each time I walked the price was lower when I returned.

And I am one of the middle class- lower middle class- but middle class none the less. How are they hurting me by negotiating the best deal they can?

If a deal has been cut- then that is great. Now on to the next stalemate- getting a budget done.

  • 1 vote
#1.27 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 2:56 PM EDT
Carol-500283

texan, you didn't give us any observation on the Wall St. mess, or are we just suppose to "forget" about that "deal"? And banks wouldn't loan someone money? Now that's hard to believe, wasn't that what we were doing is shoring them up so that they could lend?? No, they put the money in their incompetent pockets and called it necessary to keep people who couldn't do the job in the first place! The auto deal was to keep regular folks jobs, the bank deal was to help Mr. Big stay BIG! Bull$#!!

  • 5 votes
#1.28 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 3:37 PM EDT
genevieveva

The republicans are the ones creating class war.

  • 4 votes
#1.29 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 7:12 PM EDT
Walt42

who received more support from Congress during their first 100 days in office, Bush or Obama?

Bush, by a landslide !! Lets not forget that within his first 100 days, Bush got his infamous "Bush Tax Cuts' passed and signed by May 27, 2001. This is clear evidence that the Republican Party IS NOT the party of fiscal responsibility. Although they are constantly claiming that title, IMHO they have never done anything to justify the claim.

  • 6 votes
#1.30 - Sat Jul 2, 2011 11:30 AM EDT
bluecollarblogger

You folks are in some sort of kool-aid induced state of dementia if you think Bush had more cooperation than Obama in the first 100 days. Obama had a super majority and controlled both houses. You can verify this by checking the results of the last election. Do any of you folks vote?

  • 1 vote
#1.31 - Mon Jul 4, 2011 7:10 PM EDT
YELLOW DOG D.

not true, blue collar.

  • 4 votes
#1.32 - Mon Jul 4, 2011 7:14 PM EDT
bluecollarblogger

Not true? Did not the democrats take control of the house and the Senate in 2008? You can still verify this "not true, blue collar" statement by viewing the results of the 2008 election.

  • 1 vote
#1.33 - Thu Jul 7, 2011 11:06 PM EDT
stormshadow

Not true Blue. Minor detail you're forgetting here. Does the term PARTY OF NO ring any bells? Rampany obstructionism, the EXTREME overuse of the fillibuster. Nothing could get pushed through so the "supermajority" is really kind of irrelevant isn't it?

  • 6 votes
#1.34 - Thu Jul 7, 2011 11:39 PM EDT
YELLOW DOG D.

blue, no super majority

  • 5 votes
#1.35 - Fri Jul 8, 2011 7:32 AM EDT
Reply
tyler-1708225

He has been treated no differently than any other president. In fact he has his race to his advantage since to disagree with his policies automaticallly gets you labeled by his more rabid fans. All presidents have been criticized and I don't see any reason Obama should be sheltered. Do you have a problem with any other president being called the worse in history?

  • 15 votes
#2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:26 PM EDT
Ronin-2

Agreed Tyler

Taking criticism, even harsh criticism, comes with the office. Just ask Bush and Carter who are still being maligned years after they have left office.

  • 10 votes
#2.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:32 PM EDT
douglasq

He has been treated no differently than any other president.

Really? What other President had their Christian faith questioned? What other President was accused of secretly being a Muslim?

What other President was accused of not being a citizen? What other President was accused of being a "Manchurian candidate?"

What other President had racist emails forwarded around about him? Or posters depicting him as a witch-doctor?

What other President was called an "affirmative action President?"

Criticism of his policies is fine. But that other stuff was out of line and no other President had to deal with it.

  • 40 votes
#2.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:40 PM EDT
Stevie-445471

Thumbs up. I might add that the e-mails have prompted me to sever long term friendships with other people. I quit attending many church functions, I never explained, I just quit participating. I have to wonder how many other people have done the same thing.

  • 22 votes
#2.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:48 PM EDT
Coral Atlas

To be a critic you should know something about what your criticizing or have something specific to be critical about.

Thus far all I hear, see and read from Obama haters is that he hasn't done enough, fast enough ... and despite all his accomplishments and the obstructionism from the GOP since day one .... he's done as well as possible .. which is much better than any other past President of the USA has done!

And at the least the last 5 or so that I've seen!

So we continue to have this dialogue about nothing ... not the issues ... but why the right wants to see Obama go down remains a mystery - they apparently can't say what it is in public, all they can say is he's going to be a one term President.

This President is not responsible for any of the problems we have today ... but he can be given credit for all of the progress we've made thus far.

The GOP is politically torn and has no intellectual platform or scruples as well as being morally bankrupt.

Need proof?

They watered down the stimulus which the majority of economists say should have been more not less. Right now they are playing political games with the debt ceiling - and one has to wonder if causing treasury bill rates to rise with their antics isn't just just putting MORE MONEY in the pockets of their supporters!! Most americans aren't wealthy enough to invest in government securities .... but you can bet the corpocracy does!

The GOP and corpocracy have divided the nation on health care by frightening the haves and discarding the have nots as democratic voters and not human beings.

They've stalled appointments and stalled or blocked practically every piece of legislation since inaugural day.

If you want something to criticize look in the mirror if your a republican who supports the crew that now wants to run our nation.

AND the right may not all be racists ... but there's more than just a few. I know - as a white male I've seen it my entire life - we all have! .... and it usually occurs in nice safe all white settings, bars and house parties and such - when some one makes racist remarks ....

and criticism without valid arguments is about as naked as it gets for exposing a racist ... it also doesn't hurt to be a white male over 40 years of age with no more than a high school education.


  • 30 votes
#2.4 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:50 PM EDT
tyler-1708225

Where is the accounting of where all the stimulus money went? Isn't it true no one even know what happened to it? Sure give them more which they can't account for. Where is there an accurate report on the supposed jobs created? Without double dipping of course.

The democrats have divided the nation on race and envy of the wealth and promised entitlements they expect someone else to pay for.

If your a democrat and want something to criticize look in the mirror and criticize the damage this administration has caused.

When you go into those nice safe all white settings, bars and house parties and such and come back with proof they are all republicans, not a leftie in the bunch.

Or a racist that is black with no education.

  • 6 votes
#2.5 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:12 PM EDT
onefan51

Stevie

I might add that the e-mails have prompted me to sever long term friendships with other people

I'm sad to hear this. I realize that at times the discussions have been heated. But to lose friends over those discussions is a serious personal tragedy.

  • 6 votes
#2.6 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:22 PM EDT
douglasq

Where is the accounting of where all the stimulus money went?

Where is the accounting for the Iraq war? Literally pallets of cash were flown into that country and are now missing.

  • 21 votes
#2.7 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:22 PM EDT
douglasq

I'm sad to hear this. I realize that at times the discussions have been heated. But to lose friends over these discussions is a serious personal tragedy.

I'm not sure but I think he is referring to the racist emails some people thought were OK to forward. It sounds like he found out some things about some of his friends he didn't previously know.

  • 12 votes
#2.8 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:24 PM EDT
katt-529866

Atlas, you are right on!!!!!!

  • 5 votes
#2.9 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:28 PM EDT
Borncorn

Where is the accounting of where all the stimulus money went?

The largest single item was a tax cut, the "Making Work Pay Credit". I believe the IRS has an exact accounting for this tax cut.

  • 4 votes
#2.10 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:49 PM EDT
Stevie-445471

One fan @2.6

It is not my wish to make you or anyone else sad. But with the e-mails revealed to me, just what was in the sender's heart. So, I was left with only one option, just avoid the senders. And as it so happens most of the offensive e-mails came from fellow church members. And I would hope that my post may serve as a warning to people who think it harmless to forward such e-mails. They are not harmless, they generate hatred and it is character assassination.

  • 6 votes
#2.11 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:18 PM EDT
Matt in MN

Really? What other President had their Christian faith questioned?

Yes. JFK was a Catholic. The first in fact.

What other President was accused of secretly being a Muslim?

None, but, that's also a relatively new stereotype. Jon Kerry and Bush weren't accused of it, so it's not like it's a partisan thing. But, in the same note, there's a handful of presidents accused of being part of some "skull & bones" fraternity.

What other President was accused of not being a citizen?

It was done to McCain too, because he was born on a foreign military installation.

What other President was accused of being a "Manchurian candidate?"

Nearly every president has been accused of being some sort of secret brotherhood that controls the government from behind some curtain. Then there's the allusions to Bush being connected with the Nazi's and stuff. The accusations about 9/11 being an inside job. Etc, etc, etc.

What other President had racist emails forwarded around about him?

Bush was depicted slightly less (Possibly even equal to) of emails and racist rhetoric as Obama (read: "Bush hates black people"). Bush was depicted as a chimpanzee in a large amount of popular email chains. When it happens about Obama, it's racism.

Or posters depicting him as a witch-doctor?

Reagan..."Voo-doo economics"

What other President was called an "affirmative action President?"

I'll give you that one. Even with all the references to Bush being a mentally challenged individual.

Criticism of his policies is fine.

I agree, and that's usually what I stick too myself. But, to pretend Obama is facing more criticism than past presidents - in my view - is quite absurd.

  • 5 votes
#2.12 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:22 PM EDT
onefan51

Reagan..."Voo-doo economics"

Didn't Reagan's vice president George H.W. Bush coin this term during the Republican debates?

  • 4 votes
#2.13 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:54 PM EDT
Nick46

What other President was accused of secretly being a Muslim?

I didn't know having a religious affiliation was something that was a secret? And OMG a Muslim!! I thought Jews were supossedly bad and we've had plenty of those.

    #2.14 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:00 PM EDT
    Matt in MN

    Didn't Reagan's vice president George H.W. Bush coin this term during the Republican debates?

    Yup. But, the question was:

    posters depicting him as a witch-doctor

      #2.15 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:11 PM EDT
      cannonballer

      Really? What other President had their Christian faith questioned? What other President was accused of secretly being a Muslim?

      Maybe Obama saying "My Muslim faith" might have had something to do with that?

      • 2 votes
      #2.16 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:14 PM EDT
      douglasq

      Yes. JFK was a Catholic. The first in fact.

      The question with JFK wasn't "Is he a Christian?" The (unfounded) question with JFK was, "Is he SO Catholic that he will show allegiance to Rome before upholding his oath of office?"

      Not at all the same B.S. Obama was subjected to.

      I agree, and that's usually what I stick too myself. But, to pretend Obama is facing more criticism than past presidents - in my view - is quite absurd.

      I didn't say he is facing more criticism. But he IS facing criticisms and accusations that no white President ever faced.

      • 6 votes
      #2.17 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:05 PM EDT
      Carol-500283

      Stevie-I too got those emails. What really frosted me was the fact that they wouldn't even check them, just send something horrible that the Pres. was supposed to have said or did, and claim it as fact. And the rascist ones also told of where their minds are. Hate comes in many forms and through many people. As much as I disliked Bush's policies, I remember when the shoe was thrown, I was outraged, that was my Pres. Where is the outrage in the Rep. party to hate filled behavior??? We still need to have our government work, I'd like to challenge the Congress to love the country more than they seem to hate the Pres.

      • 6 votes
      #2.18 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 1:28 PM EDT
      Walt42

      Tyler...from you questions:

      Where is the accounting of where all the stimulus money went? Isn't it true no one even know what happened to it?

      I presume that you are young, and in need of education. Therefore, I direct you to the following site, so that you might find the answers to your questions.

      You are welcome.

      • 3 votes
      #2.19 - Sun Jul 3, 2011 9:48 PM EDT
      YELLOW DOG D.

      recovery.gov

      • 1 vote
      #2.20 - Mon Jul 4, 2011 12:34 PM EDT
      Reply
      Larry Marvin

      I don't think any president is ever treated fairly. Politics is seldom civil.

      • 7 votes
      Reply#3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:33 PM EDT
      onefan51

      Politics is seldom civil.

      Agreed. But in Obama's case, do you believe he has been treated fair or unfair?

      • 4 votes
      #3.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:13 PM EDT
      lib50

      It was done to McCain too, because he was born on a foreign military installation.

      Except Hawaii isn't foreign soil.

      • 2 votes
      #3.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:33 PM EDT
      Matt in MN

      Except Hawaii isn't foreign soil.

      Right, the Panama Canal is though.

      • 1 vote
      #3.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:43 PM EDT
      Reply
      Matt Rock

      Every President in history -- including Washington! -- was labeled "the worst ever" by someone at some point. This has become particularly true since the dawn of the media age, with radio, TV, and now the Internet stoking those fires to new levels. Having said that, I do think the vitriol against President Obama is a new brand of hatred we haven't seen before.

      Before President Obama took office, people on the right, many of whom are still as vocal, were claiming President Obama was the worst President ever. He wasn't even moved into the Oval Office before people were blaming everything on him. The nuts who feel this way are a vocal minority, but a minority nevertheless, and a small one at that. Most Americans either approve of the President, or aren't sure, or don't really care. So I don't really think it's a matter of whether he's been treated fairly, so much as how loud and hyperbolic the tiny swath of fringers can get. the Republican Congress and their obstructionist, destroy-the-economy agenda? That's another matter entirely.

      • 20 votes
      Reply#4 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:42 PM EDT
      Stevie-445471

      No, I do not think he has been treated fairly. I don't ever recall anyone questing a presidents citizenship, his loyalty to this country. But then I have to admit I am not surprised, this is just exactly what I expected from the GOP. They did not disappoint me. What they have succeeded in doing is alienating and destroying long term friendships.

      • 15 votes
      Reply#5 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:44 PM EDT
      lifeisgood43

      Hell no. You are talking about a man who had to release his birth cert just to make the birth news go away. You are also talking about a man who did stop the job negative lost to at least adding jobs. They refuse to give him any credit for that.

      Now wea ll relizes that he has done stuff that has us scrathing our heads, but the some of things that he is attack on, makes it not fair overall.

      • 12 votes
      Reply#6 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:47 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      "You are talking about a man who had to release his birth cert just to make the birth news go away."

      How does that compare to a man who is accused of an inside job to attack his own country on 9/11?

      You are also talking about a man who did stop the job negative lost to at least adding jobs"

      Where are those jobs, private or public sector, region, pay, benefits, full-time, part-time, category, long term or short term? Without double dipping of course. Stop job lost? So why did the unemployment figures go up.

      • 1 vote
      #6.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:34 PM EDT
      lib50

      Difference is that most people didn't buy into the conspiracy theories about 9/11, tyler. But you have a large majority of republicans that STILL believe the lies about Obama.

      • 5 votes
      #6.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:35 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      Where can I find proof of that, lib? Not that it isn't a flimsy excuse you are making. What does numbers have to do with it?

      • 1 vote
      #6.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:59 PM EDT
      Neish1920

      Where are those jobs, private or public sector, region, pay, benefits, full-time, part-time, category, long term or short term? Without double dipping of course. Stop job lost? So why did the unemployment figures go up.

      India, China, and other areas of the Orient. AND others have been replaced by ATM machines, self check out Machines, and other automated measures that have been introduced into our soceity over the years.

      Do you know some banks charge you extra if you actually come in a branch a certain number of times per year vs using the ATM machine?

      And then there is automation in general. I dont need a whole accounting department if I can find software that cuts down on the number of people to do the job I need.

      I dont need as many recruiters to read resumes with an automated applicant tracking system. I dont need as many payroll specialists if employees can go home and enter changes and other information related to payroll online from the comfort of their homes, blackberries and Ipads. I dont need to hire more people from the mail room when the bulk of the correspondance for the company is sent via email.

      ATT doesnt need to hire operators anymore, when we can type in the name of a company in my phone GPS and get the number, address, and spoken directions. And who needs a travel agent when I can go to expedia, or just go to the airline's website myself and book a flight, rent a car and get a hotel room?

      • 1 vote
      #6.4 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:48 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      So, then it was already known the stimulus would not improve the job situation and keep unemployment under 8%?

      • 2 votes
      #6.5 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:52 PM EDT
      Neish1920

      In some areas it can, and in some it cant. The job loss in the sectors I mentioned started showing in 2005 or so. Over all, it stareted in the late 60's, early 70's or so. Slowly, but surely. Job loss of this magnitude does not just happen in 3 years, or even 10. As automation and technology increase, companies see more ways to increase their bottom line...

      AND our education system has been stagnent for 30 years. That has a lot to do with it as well. Some companies simply dont have a large enough talent pool to choose from in the US and have to seek employees from overseas.

      • 1 vote
      #6.6 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:36 AM EDT
      onefan51

      dont have a large enough talent pool to choose from in the US

      It's not that I disagree with you nor am I arguing the point but Neish, I find this very hard to believe.

      • 3 votes
      #6.7 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:57 AM EDT
      Neish1920

      It's not that I disagree with you nor am I arguing the point but Neish, I find this very hard to believe.

      It depends on the area. In some areas of medicine, certain specialties are just not common in the US. Even when you look @ the number of people who major in the programs in US colleges and universities. There are specific areas in IT as well that few people get involved in. Where in some countries simple computer language is required and not an elective offer. IMO, we need to get rid of Home Ec and replace it with CIS instead and start foreign language @ the elementary school levels so we have more Americans who are bilingual and can communicate in a global business environment.

      • 2 votes
      #6.8 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 10:55 AM EDT
      onefan51

      start foreign language @ the elementary school levels so we have more Americans who are bilingual and can communicate in a global business environment.

      I agree with you 100 percent.

      • 4 votes
      #6.9 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 11:20 AM EDT
      Reply
      Holly-348328

      Obama seems to be the kind of President that you really like or really hate. I have seen a lot of really ugly things said about Obama, but I only became observant of politics when W. became President so I can't really equate what's being said/written about Obama being more or less unfair to anyone besides W.

      I have to say that from what I've observed it's about the same.

      • 7 votes
      Reply#7 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:51 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      What other president has been accused of doing an inside side against his own country? Why is Obama's admitted drug use ignored when it has been hurled unrelentlessly toward another president on the words of his ex-sister-in-law? When has another president gotten away with sitting in a church for 20 years and not hearing a word said against our country? Why was Bush and the Bin Laden family such a big issue, but Obama and Ayers relationship swept under the carpet. Why was Michelle never questioned on how she got the lucative position she held while claiming she was doing community service while Laura's Bush's whole life was screened. Your adoration of Obama is admirable but there is no unfairness in the way he is treated versus other presidents for you to be whining about.

      • 5 votes
      Reply#8 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:02 PM EDT
      douglasq

      What other president has been accused of doing an inside side over a terrorist attack?

      Any sane person accuses him of incompetence, not complicity.

      Why is Obama's admitted drug use ignored when it has been hurled unrelentlessly toward another president on the words of his sister-in-law?

      Bush was drunk in office. I don't care how much coke he did before being president.

      When has another president gotten away with sitting in a church for 20 years and not hearing a word said against our country?

      What does that even mean?

      Why was Bush and the Bin Laden family such a big issue, but Obama and Ayers relationship swept under the carpet.

      Because the Bush's seem to have a habit of profiting from countries that mean us harm. Look up Prescott Bush's dealings with Nazi Germany.

      Why was Michelle never questioned on how she got the lucative position she held why claiming she was doing community service while Laura's Bush's whole life was screened.

      I don't remember Michelle Obama committing vehicular homicide.

      Your adoration of Obama is admirable but there is no unfairness in the way he is treated versus other presidents for you to be whining about.

      If you say so. BTW, I voted for Hillary.

      • 7 votes
      #8.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:10 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      "Bush was drunk in office. I don't care how much coke he did before being president."

      You have proof of that of course and are not just unfairly criticizing like you are accusing others of doing to Obama. I'll wait for the proof or see you as just another hypocrite.

      "Because the Bush's seem to have a habit of profiting from countries that mean us harm. Look up Prescott Bush's dealings with Nazi Germany."

      Since the noble democrat Harriman owned the bank and held 392 shares of the 400 and Prescott Bush only 1 share, shouldn't it be Harriman you are accusing since your party hates all those bankers and CEOs and claim to defend the little man? Then do a research on old Joe Kennedy and explain why the democrats think those he sired are more worthy of office than the Bushes.

      "I don't remember Michelle Obama committing vehicular homicide."

      An 18 year old teen ager running a stop light is hardly comparable to a grown adult man leaving a woman to drown. Laura stepped up and faced the music, she didn't run and hide behind family and lawyers. She also didn't run for office. You want to talk murder, let's talk your democrat senator and a democrat candidate for president.

      "If you say so. BTW, I voted for Hillary."

      That was a smart vote. Too bad more didn't.

      • 1 vote
      #8.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:28 PM EDT
      douglasq

      You have proof of that of course and are not just unfairly criticizing like you are accusing others of doing to Obama.

      I am the son and grandson of Irish alcoholics. There are plenty of pictures of Bush where his appearance and behavior were all too familiar. Take a look at the pics of him from the Beijing Olympics.

      • 3 votes
      #8.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:41 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      Having alcoholic Irish ancestors is proof? LOL. What does your expertise say about all the pictures of Ted Kennedy. Do you want to officially diagnose him too?

      • 1 vote
      #8.4 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:53 PM EDT
      cannonballer

      douglasq

      You have proof of that of course and are not just unfairly criticizing like you are accusing others of doing to Obama.

      I am the son and grandson of Irish alcoholics. There are plenty of pictures of Bush where his appearance and behavior were all too familiar. Take a look at the pics of him from the Beijing Olympics.

      Wow, Irish alcoholic ancestors. You are practically an expert.

      • 2 votes
      #8.5 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:19 PM EDT
      douglasq

      Having alcoholic Irish ancestors is proof?

      No. Expertise in recognizing alcoholic behavior.

      Wow, Irish alcoholic ancestors. You are practically an expert.

      Yes, I am.

      • 3 votes
      #8.6 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:07 PM EDT
      Reply
      TR-421173

      We all will decide on our own - but since knowledge is power, I am passing this along...
      A question of perspective :
      Obama/Biden v.s. McCain/Palin, what if things were switched around?... think about it. Would the country's collective point of view be different? Could racism be the culprit?

      Ponder the following:
      ·What if the Obamas had paraded five children across the stage, including a three-month-old infant and an unwed, pregnant teenage daughter?
      ·What if John McCain was a former president of the Harvard Law Review?
      ·What if Barack Obama finished fifth from the bottom of his graduating class?
      ·What if McCain had only married once, and Obama was a divorcee?
      ·What if Obama was the candidate who left his first wife after a severe disfiguring car accident, when she no longer measured up to his standards?
      ·What if Obama had met his second wife in a bar and had a long affair while he was still married?
      ·What if Michelle Obama was the wife who not only became addicted to painkillers but also acquired them illegally through her charitable organization?
      ·What if Cindy McCain graduated from Harvard?
      ·What if Obama had been a member of the Keating Five? (The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s.)
      ·What if McCain was a charismatic, eloquent speaker?
      ·What if Obama couldn't read from a teleprompter?
      ·What if Obama was the one who had military experience that included discipline problems and a record of crashi ng seven planes?
      ·What if Obama was the one who was known to display publicly, on many occasions, a serious anger management problem?
      ·What if Michelle Obama's family had made their money from beer distribution?
      ·What if the Obamas had adopted a white child?
      ·You could easily add to this list. If these questions reflected reality, do you really believe the election numbers would be as close as they are? This is what racism does. It covers up, rationalizes and minimizes positive qualities in one candidate and emphasizes negative qualities in another when there is a color difference.
      Educational Background:
      ·Barack Obama:
      Columbia University - B.A. Political Science with a Specialization in International Relations.
      Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna *** Laude
      Joseph Biden:
      University of Delaware - B.A. in History and B.A. in Political Science.
      Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)
      VS.
      ·John McCain:
      United States Naval Academy - Class rank: 894 of 899
      Sarah Palin:
      Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semester
      North Idaho College - 2 semesters - general study
      University of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalism
      Matanuska-Susitna College - 1 semester
      University of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in Journalism

      Education isn't everything, but this is about the two highest offices in the land as well as our standing in the world. You make the call.

      Posted By: Moosedog66 (October 27, 2008 at 7:02 PM)

      http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/sprinttotheoval/archive/2008/10/27/in-cleveland-mccain-talks-of-a-dangerous-threesome/comments.aspx

      • 17 votes
      Reply#9 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:36 PM EDT
      Neish1920

      What if the Obamas had paraded five children across the stage, including a three-month-old infant and an unwed, pregnant teenage daughter?

      That alone would have put the nail in the coffin!!! Then they want to give her cool points for keeping her baby!!! Most black girls do as well. BUT they and their children are likened to 'fatherless-welfare-garbage..' <<<<that term is from the old MSNBC board, those who were on it may remember a poster that used it all the time...

      • 5 votes
      #9.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:56 PM EDT
      stormshadow

      you DO know that by putting THAT many facts into 1 post- you PROBABLY just sent the Repug Spin Machine into overload/self destruct mode?? lol

      • 5 votes
      #9.2 - Sat Jul 2, 2011 11:06 AM EDT
      Reply
      tyler-1708225

      John McCain isn't, never was, and will never be president. Why are you grasping at something that isn't, wasn't and never will be.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#10 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:56 PM EDT
      JEN-357892

      tyler

      It sounds like you take issue with showing a comparison of how one person who ran versus another person who ran for office COULD be viewed. I think the illustration is one for those with an open mind to consider if we would respond the same if these things were applied to the other side. That in my opinion is fair to ponder and if it enlightens you...all the better.

      The comment was never stated from what I read to be about who became President as you suggest but the behavior toward two candidates who did ran for the same position.

      Well done, TR! I learned from it. Thank you.

      • 5 votes
      #10.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:34 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      Please explain why Obama is being treated unfairly because you think he had better personal qualifications than McCain. Are you now going to look at each former president's opponent and then use the comparison over whether they are unfairly criticized or not? You are grasping here. Obama like all presidents is being criticized on his actions in office not personal comparisons between him and his opponent. You can't hold McCain responsible for Obama being criticized.

      • 1 vote
      #10.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:40 PM EDT
      JEN-357892

      tyler are you addressing me?

      • 1 vote
      #10.3 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 2:39 PM EDT
      Reply
      markpup

      Overall, the press is kind to Obama.

      I remember the Nixon years the press was unrelentingly horrific toward him. But he deserved it.

      Reagan got treated pretty well by the press also, but Bush Jr did not. Bill Clinton started out badly but in his later years as President, the press was much better to him. But the press seemed to hate Hilary.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#11 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:20 PM EDT
      Lynn-410457

      IMO, he has not only not been treated fairly but he has been treated shoddily. No other POTUS in my remembrance has had to show his birth certificate, eventhough the vetting process was completed prior to his ever even filing to run, had more lies told and more hateful and mean things said and manufactured than this President. He is a very smart man, but people continually call into question his education, his grades, his payment for his education and things that absolutely do not matter, as everything they question is in the past. They have hagged on his wife, her size, her interests, the way she dresses and every other ridiculous detail. They criticize every part of his and her lives. And why? Do you honestly think that will not make him President? Some need to get a life and get on with it and quit with the lies, 1/2 truths and embellishments. How many past Presidents give a damn about what goes on in Washington once they are gone? See this for what it is, and it is a bunch of wannabees like Rove, the Koch Bros., and others wanting to buy the next election and all that support that, remember you will get what you give!

      • 5 votes
      Reply#12 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:13 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      Reading that, Lynn, I can see more clearly than ever why he doesn't get treated any more unfairly than other presidents. They have all faced the same criticisms along with their policies.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#13 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:19 PM EDT
      Lynn-410457

      Tyler, Right....I am not even going there with you. I know the truth and don't have time to read your ramblings.

      • 2 votes
      #13.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:39 PM EDT
      tyler-1708225

      LOL. That's fine with me, but I will answer yours whether you read them or not. I don't run.

        #13.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:54 PM EDT
        Reply
        agagnu

        Hellbent on making Obama a one-term President upon his confirmation, the GOP blinded obsession has turned them associates of Bin Laden, carrying on the agenda of making USA bankrupt.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#14 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:20 PM EDT
        tyler-1708225

        Can you name a time when the democrats weren't hell bent on making a republican a one termer? As far as the Bin Laden remark, that is nonsense talk.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#15 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:29 PM EDT
        lifeisgood43

        tyler... can you come of with evidence by Dem saying on record that they wanted to make a Rep Pres a one-timer

        • 2 votes
        #15.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:39 PM EDT
        Reply
        tyler-1708225

        Or should I say "unfair critisism" that you throw about so freely yourselves, while thinking you deserve more respect than you give.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#16 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:39 PM EDT
        lifeisgood43

        What Pres was attacked for trying to win the Olympics for their country and nation. What Pres had a group cheering against him when his nation didn't win the Olympics.

        Pres Obama did

        • 3 votes
        Reply#17 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:38 PM EDT
        Lynn-410457

        True, bunch of duffesses. They would not support him if he came up with a cure for cancer, unless their sorry butts needed it, then they would want to be his new BF. What a bunch of loser hypocrites, who wonder why the rest of the world think we are so dumb and backwards!

        • 5 votes
        #17.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:43 PM EDT
        tyler-1708225

        I'm sure the rest of the world doesn't even read the vine, Lynn.

        • 1 vote
        #17.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:49 PM EDT
        It Aint So

        What Pres had a group cheering against him when his nation didn't win the Olympics.

        Then perhaps he should stick to something he knows something about - like community organizing. Business sure isnt his forte.

        But I did get tired of the Obama comparisons to Hitler.

        At least Hitler got the Olympics to come to Berlin.

        who wonder why the rest of the world think we are so dumb and backwards!

        who really gives a damn what the rest of the world thinks? I sure dont...

        • 3 votes
        #17.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:07 PM EDT
        Lynn-410457

        It AintSo, That figures that you wouldn't care. But you need to begin to set up and take notice since we are a GLOBAL economy now, not just an economy of the good old USA. I would bet you have never been abroad, so you wouldn't know how the rest of the world thinks and views us. We are no longer isolated here and we need to begin to think and research things or we will be one of the 3rd world countries that others are looking at. Take off your blinders!

        Tyler, I was not talking about the NV posters. If they viewed the Conservative posters on here, they would think that we were all backward rednecks. I was talking about the country as a whole.

        • 5 votes
        #17.4 - Sat Jul 2, 2011 2:27 PM EDT
        Reply
        tyler-1708225

        What president was attacked at sending a wrong message to children because he drove on his own property without a seat belt. What first lady was accused of never holding a job and criticized for making literacy her project instead of women's issues? What first lady was criticised for leaving Washington early on a holiday to attend to her elderly mother?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#18 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:46 PM EDT
        Lynn-410457

        tyler, Who freakin' cares? Just because you can drag maybe scenarios out of your arse, does not take away from the fact that Obama has been treated like crap and you and your ilk will make every excuse under the heavens as to why, but doesn't make it right!

        • 7 votes
        #18.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:53 PM EDT
        YELLOW DOG D.

        lynn, by God you are right. you can say what said a thousand times.

        • 4 votes
        #18.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 9:26 PM EDT
        stormshadow

        Seconded!

        • 4 votes
        #18.3 - Sat Jul 2, 2011 11:08 AM EDT
        Reply
        Alan Curtis Montgomery

        The GOP never fights fair, history has proven this.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#19 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:56 PM EDT
        It Aint So

        Really? how about enlightening us with some of that "history". You should have no problem detailing a couple of verifiable instances.

        • 2 votes
        #19.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:04 PM EDT
        markpup

        I'd also add here if the GOP really doesn't fight fair, the Democrats should stop whining and respond in kind. Bring LBJ back he had no problem with throwing dirt especially if someone was dumb enough to draw first blood on him.

        • 2 votes
        #19.2 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:07 PM EDT
        Alan Curtis Montgomery

        I would have loved to have been alive to see "Give Them Hell Harry" Harry Truman give the Republicans hell or alive to see FDR lay into the fat cats. Those must have been the days when the Democrats had b***s. Now most in my party are too worried about being nice, my censoring proves its contagious.

        • 4 votes
        #19.3 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:28 PM EDT
        Alan Curtis Montgomery

        It Aint So all I have to do is name names George W. Bush, Mitch McConnell, John Bohner, Jon Kyl, John McCain, Eric Cantor, and pretty much the whole rest of the GOP especially the tea party. It is win at all cost with them even if that means screwing the American people and the economy.

        • 6 votes
        #19.4 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:37 PM EDT
        cannonballer

        Alan Curtis Montgomery

        The GOP never fights fair, history has proven this.

        Yeah, all those illegal bribes to get HC passed, late night, back room deals..Oh, wait a sec.

        • 2 votes
        #19.5 - Sun Jul 3, 2011 12:24 PM EDT
        Reply
        tyler-1708225

        Actually, the GOP is just now starting to fight fair. You are seeing what is meant by "what goes around come around."

        • 1 vote
        Reply#20 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:09 PM EDT
        YELLOW DOG D.

        tyler, i have come to respect you. i have never seen a person so consistently piss into the wind. most of the time you have credible evidence for your arguments. i wish you well but to be fair, i will work to defeat most of your ideals. i know a lot of repubs, 90% were upset with the race of President Obama. they are calming down now, but you should admit the President has not been treated fairly by congress. when repubs vote against bills they were for just because the President agrees them. they are wrong. i present no cut and paste evidence. i respect your opposition to policies but search your soul about the treatment of this President by congress. this just my opinion

        • 3 votes
        #20.1 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 11:13 AM EDT
        SCTexan

        What kind of friends do you have that 90% are bigots?

        • 1 vote
        #20.2 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 11:30 AM EDT
        YELLOW DOG D.

        i live in Texas, sc.

        • 1 vote
        #20.3 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 12:18 PM EDT
        SCTexan

        None of my friends cared one bit that he is black, only that he is liberal.

        • 2 votes
        #20.4 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 12:21 PM EDT
        YELLOW DOG D.

        i wish that was true with the ones i know.

        • 2 votes
        #20.5 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 12:50 PM EDT
        Reply
        T is for T-time

        I really do not care if Obama is treated fairly. He deserves to be shouted down every time his lying mouth opens. Was Palin treated fairly? Bachman? Bush? Reagan? How about Clarence Thomas? Is he treated fairly? To hell with Democrats and their spineless media image. Obama is masterfully working his way to a one term deal. It is only a matter of time before he gets booed off the stage. He's already being heckled by his own constituants. What a joke.

        • 6 votes
        Reply#21 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:00 PM EDT
        It Aint So

        Excellent post....!

        • 2 votes
        #21.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:01 PM EDT
        Reply
        Coral Atlas

        The GOP will get as far as they can continue to get some working class americans to believe their propaganda and lies and be manipulated by the hate rhetoric, anger and fear ....

        frankly I think all normal americans are tired of the politics instead of concentrating on getting results .....

        although some continue to blame the democrats and OUR President - the truth is clear for all to see!

        When working class republicans connect the dots and realize they are no different than working class democrats ... they will hopefully do the right thing at the polls.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#22 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:11 PM EDT
        It Aint So

        the truth is clear for all to see!

        Yep - Liberals are full of it.

        • 3 votes
        #22.1 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:12 PM EDT
        Reply
        Remain Free

        Yes I think that Americans have treated him fairly and I certainly hope that we continue to treat him fairly when he becomes unemployed in 2012 and since ACORN no longer exist maybe his friends in Brazil would love to have him stay with them; he can be a community organizer there.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#23 - Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:25 PM EDT
        jade1

        To me it's more of lack of respect for President Obama. I didn't care for Bush but I respected his position as President.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#24 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 8:00 AM EDT
        keepfreepress

        Bush came up with the bailouts before he left office and the GOP was happy to go along with it.

        But once Obama was elected the GOP did not want to help the country by going along with the stimulus and people forget it was Obama that approved the tax breaks to the middle class as one of the first things Obama did in office, I got a check as everyone in the lower tax brackets received and then the tax deductions that showed up on the payroll stubs confirmed some of the taxes were lowered.

        All economists have repeatedly said that our taxes especially on the rich are the lowest ever.

        Why is everyone bashing Obama for the enormous efforts he has tried to do for the American people while the GOP has done nothing but obstruct trying to get back to "business as usual".

        Things have changed, if they hadn't the GOP wouldn't be opposing all the progress that is being made.

        Roger Ailes after Obama was elected admitted that Fox was way too harsh on Obama and indulged in an "unfair media war" against him and his campaign.

        While those were nothing but "crocodile tears" coming from Ailes, what followed not long afterward was the insulting Bret Baier interview, and when compared to the Baier interview with Bush and the one with Obama is was very obvious Fox was back to it's "unfair media war" since they were rude and insulting to a President the American people elected.

        Obama has shown a great deal of grace under pressure and had tolerated or compromised with the Republicans so why do they bash him??

        Republicans don't care about fairness, they don't care about what's right or wrong for the American people, they only want power.

        After 8 years in power the GOP handed over the worst mess in American history and have done little to admit it or fix it.

        I wouldn't trust the GOP to fix it, none of their ideas are new or better than before, we will only end up with more GOP failures.

        The GOP has not been fair to Obama, the GOP went to their home districts claiming credit for the stimulus even though the GOP voted against it. The GOP lied to their constituents.

        Obama has been more than fair with his own base criticizing him for compromising with the GOP when the country gets nothing in return from the GOP. One sided government doesn't work but one sided government is all the GOP is working for and the voters need to understand that if the GOP isn't working for us then they are working against us. This has nothing to do with Obama, the GOP needs to stop the partisanship and compromise in good faith.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#25 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 9:41 AM EDT
        onefan51

        The GOP has not been fair to Obama, the GOP went to their home districts claiming credit for the stimulus even though the GOP voted against it. The GOP lied to their constituents.

        True. I remember when this happened and thought how hypocritical these GOP officials had behaved. Some had even added amendments, voted against the very same amendments, and then blamed Obama for signing the bill into law.

        • 3 votes
        #25.1 - Fri Jul 1, 2011 10:07 AM EDT
        stormshadow

        True. I remember when this happened and thought how hypocritical these GOP officials had behaved. Some had even added amendments, voted against the very same amendments, and then blamed Obama for signing the bill into law.

        exactly right, yet somehow the level of HYPOCRISY there doesn't seem to register to anyone with an R after their names! Unbelieveable.

        • 5 votes
        #25.2 - Sat Jul 2, 2011 11:12 AM EDT
        Reply
        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
        Newsvine Privacy Statement
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        FUN STUFF:
        • Leaderboard |
        • E-Mail Alerts |
        • Top of the Vine |
        • Newsvine Live |
        • Newsvine Archives |
        • The Greenhouse |
        COMPANY STUFF:
        • Code of Honor |
        • Company Info |
        • Contact Us |
        • Jobs |
        • User Agreement |
        • Privacy Policy |
        • About our ads
        LEGAL STUFF:
        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com